South African vs Albanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Albanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Albanians
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Albanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,134,120 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.68%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Albanian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 22.1% |
Range | 42.4% | 20.9% |
Mean | 10.8% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Albanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |