Shoshone vs Yuman Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Yuman
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Yuman
16.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Yuman Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,727,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,221,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 27.8%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Yuman |
Minimum | 0.78% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 78.7% | 66.7% |
Range | 77.9% | 61.7% |
Mean | 27.1% | 32.7% |
Median | 20.6% | 34.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.3% | 43.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.9% | 27.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.9% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Yuman by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Creek (16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Tohono O'odham (21.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Apache (21.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (21.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 6.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |