Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Austrian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Austrian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Austrians
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
44.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Austrian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,809,580 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,015,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Austrian |
Minimum | 10.2% | 14.3% |
Maximum | 42.7% | 56.8% |
Range | 32.5% | 42.4% |
Mean | 21.6% | 31.8% |
Median | 19.8% | 30.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 37.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.12%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |