Osage vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Osage
 Chippewa
 In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Osage
Chippewa
80.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,641 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 80.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,988,239 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218 and weighted average of 81.3%, a difference of 0.82%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 35.3% | 38.5% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 64.7% | 61.5% | 
| Mean | 77.9% | 77.6% | 
| Median | 80.6% | 79.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 74.0% | 72.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.1% | 85.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 13.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 14.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 14.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Osage and Chippewa by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Iroquois (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belize (80.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican American Indian (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (80.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Dominica (80.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (81.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Nonimmigrants (81.2%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (81.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Guatemalan (81.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (81.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 81.3% | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 81.1% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 81.1% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 80.6% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 80.6% | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 80.6% |