Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
16.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,413,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,424,226 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 69.0%.
![Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Male Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/male-poverty/natives-alaskans-vs-immigrants-from-czechoslovakia-male-poverty-chart.webp)
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 6.2% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 53.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 47.3% | 49.6% |
Mean | 24.0% | 11.2% |
Median | 21.1% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.5% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Houma (16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Ute (16.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Apache (17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Asian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Austria (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |