Native/Alaskan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Tohono O'odham
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Tohono O'odham
18.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.4%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,638,915 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,718,506 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 24.4%, a difference of 35.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 90.4% |
| Range | 51.9% | 82.0% |
| Mean | 24.8% | 37.7% |
| Median | 22.8% | 34.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 48.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 26.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Tohono O'odham by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (17.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Houma (18.4%, a difference of 2.0%), Apache (18.4%, a difference of 2.0%), Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and Black/African American (17.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (23.7%, a difference of 3.1%), Navajo (23.1%, a difference of 5.7%), Lumbee (21.9%, a difference of 11.3%), Pima (21.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 13.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 24.4% |