Mongolian vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Yugoslavian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Yugoslavians
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,546,705 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 3.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 66.7% |
| Range | 97.3% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 17.1% | 15.4% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
| Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |