Okinawan vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Okinawan
Yugoslavian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Okinawans
Yugoslavians
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,206,320 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.14%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Okinawan | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 66.7% |
Range | 65.5% | 64.4% |
Mean | 15.9% | 15.4% |
Median | 13.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Okinawans and Yugoslavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Uganda (12.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |