Ute vs Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Costa Rican
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Costa Ricans
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Costa Rican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,202,107 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 34.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
| Range | 90.4% | 78.0% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 19.6% |
| Median | 25.0% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 16.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
| Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
| Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
| Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
| Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |