New Zealander vs Aleut Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Aleut
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Aleuts
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Aleut Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 25.4%, a difference of 21.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Aleut |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.1% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 27.1% | 37.3% |
| Median | 21.3% | 29.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 45.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 22.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 22.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |