Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from China Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from China
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from China
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from China Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,223,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,266,069 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.41%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.71% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 12.8% |
| Range | 7.3% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.78% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from China by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Netherlands (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Kenya (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |