Immigrants from Turkey vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Chippewa
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,940,059 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 37.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 75.6% | 57.4% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 22.5% |
| Median | 8.7% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Argentina (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Palestinian (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |