Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Hungary Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Immigrants from Hungary
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Immigrants from Hungary
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Hungary Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,940,059 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,630,615 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.49%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Immigrants from Hungary |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 37.5% |
| Range | 75.6% | 35.8% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 9.2% |
| Median | 8.7% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Hungary by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Argentina (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Palestinian (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Sri Lankan (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |