Immigrants from Taiwan vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Bhutanese
8.9%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,036,571 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 6.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 31.2% |
| Range | 16.8% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 8.9% |
| Median | 7.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 2.0%), Thai (8.7%, a difference of 2.3%), Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |