Immigrants from England vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Bhutanese
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,609,977 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 31.2% |
| Range | 55.9% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 8.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |