Immigrants from Moldova vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Bhutanese
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,352,223 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 4.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 31.2% |
| Range | 26.5% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 8.9% |
| Median | 8.8% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Korean (9.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |