Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Bhutanese
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.29%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 17.7% | 31.2% |
| Range | 17.6% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 8.9% |
| Median | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia and Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |