Immigrants from Taiwan vs Bulgarian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Bulgarian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Bulgarians
8.9%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Bulgarian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,036,571 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,546,988 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 4.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Bulgarian |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 52.6% |
| Range | 16.8% | 52.3% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 8.0% |
| Median | 7.9% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Bulgarians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 2.0%), Thai (8.7%, a difference of 2.3%), Chinese (8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |