Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Hungarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Hungarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Hungarians
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines vs Hungarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,090,975 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 20.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | Hungarian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 27.6% | 73.9% |
Range | 25.5% | 72.6% |
Mean | 12.5% | 18.8% |
Median | 13.0% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 26.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 16.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines are Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |