Colombian vs Hungarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Colombian
Hungarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Colombians
Hungarians
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Hungarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,235,280 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colombian | Hungarian |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 73.9% |
Range | 16.5% | 72.6% |
Mean | 12.9% | 18.8% |
Median | 13.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 26.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians and Hungarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |