Samoan vs Hungarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Hungarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Hungarians
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Hungarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,052,897 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.42%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 38.0% | 73.9% |
| Range | 35.7% | 72.6% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 18.8% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 26.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Hungarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |