Immigrants from Scotland vs Lithuanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Lithuanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Lithuanians
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Lithuanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,352,980 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.390 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,480,494 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.55%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Maximum | 17.4% | 53.0% |
| Range | 16.8% | 52.8% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 11.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Lithuanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |