Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Lithuanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Lithuanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Lithuanians
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Lithuanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,480,494 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Maximum | 17.7% | 53.0% |
| Range | 17.6% | 52.8% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 11.4% |
| Median | 8.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia and Lithuanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |