Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Hong Kong
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,352,980 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.390 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 0.36%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 17.4% | 15.8% |
| Range | 16.8% | 14.5% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 8.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |