Immigrants from Dominica vs Cajun Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominica
Cajun
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominica
Cajuns
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominica vs Cajun Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,687,613 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 0.080%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Dominica | Cajun |
Minimum | 2.4% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.1% | 94.1% |
Mean | 18.0% | 21.9% |
Median | 16.9% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 25.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominica and Cajuns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |