Pennsylvania German vs Cajun Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Cajun
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Cajuns
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Cajun Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,998,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,687,613 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 32.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Cajun |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.6% | 94.1% |
| Mean | 19.5% | 21.9% |
| Median | 12.4% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.6% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.5% | 12.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |