Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Immigrants from South Central Asia
13.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
25.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,101,802 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,522,923 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 24.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.46% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 16.5% |
Range | 33.6% | 16.1% |
Mean | 13.1% | 8.1% |
Median | 11.0% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 3.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.35%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |