Immigrants from Italy vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Egyptian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Egyptians
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,580,979 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 0.040%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Egyptian |
Minimum | 7.7% | 11.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 52.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 40.4% |
Mean | 28.7% | 20.8% |
Median | 15.6% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |