Soviet Union vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Sub-Saharan Africans
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 24.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.56% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 69.8% |
| Range | 25.7% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 20.8% |
| Median | 9.2% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |