Jordanian vs Armenian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Armenian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Armenians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Armenian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,765,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Armenian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 60.0% |
Range | 33.7% | 53.3% |
Mean | 17.3% | 18.8% |
Median | 17.8% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Armenians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Pakistan (18.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Moldova (18.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |