Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistani Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Pakistani
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Pakistanis
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistani Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,177,271 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Pakistani |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 44.1% |
Range | 26.1% | 43.3% |
Mean | 11.4% | 14.0% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistanis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |