Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Asian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Asian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Asians
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Asian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,886,989 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 10.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Asian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 21.9% |
| Range | 26.1% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.3% |
| Median | 11.4% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Asians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |