Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Afghan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Afghan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Afghans
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Afghan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,814,784 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Afghan |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 31.3% |
| Range | 26.1% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 13.2% |
| Median | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Afghans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |