Immigrants from Albania vs Immigrants from Peru Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Albania
Immigrants from Peru
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Albania
Immigrants from Peru
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Albania vs Immigrants from Peru Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,347,063 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,728,905 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Albania | Immigrants from Peru |
Minimum | 0.46% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 22.1% | 56.3% |
Range | 21.6% | 56.1% |
Mean | 12.0% | 14.4% |
Median | 11.7% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Peru by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Albania are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |