Iranian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 3.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 18.6% |
| Range | 27.5% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 9.4% |
| Median | 9.0% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |