Filipino vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment
COMPARE
Filipino
Scotch-Irish
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Filipinos
Scotch-Irish
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,275,542 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,559,279 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 58.0% |
| Range | 7.7% | 56.8% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 11.3% |
| Median | 4.5% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Scotch-Irish by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Yugoslavian (4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), French (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Zimbabwean (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |