Filipino vs Burmese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Burmese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Burmese
10.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Burmese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,106,597 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,783,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 6.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Burmese |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 48.2% |
| Range | 16.4% | 46.5% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 11.4% |
| Median | 8.9% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Burmese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |