Ecuadorian vs Somali Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Somali
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Somalis
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Somali Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,253,282 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52a29/52a29b4fc74392edf62f8f1b2b5c7716a09b0fe4" alt="Ecuadorian vs Somali Family Poverty"
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Somali |
Minimum | 1.5% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 42.2% |
Range | 20.5% | 38.0% |
Mean | 10.5% | 12.6% |
Median | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Somalis by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |