Czechoslovakian vs Hungarian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Hungarian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Hungarians
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Hungarian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,916,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,502,236 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 0.83%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Hungarian |
Minimum | 7.4% | 6.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.6% | 94.0% |
Mean | 33.3% | 31.6% |
Median | 25.9% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.1% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 40.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.8% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.6% | 22.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Hungarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |