Choctaw vs Belizean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Belizean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Belizeans
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Belizean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,584,402 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,932,988 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Belizean |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 16.5% |
| Range | 28.3% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 7.4% |
| Median | 8.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Belizeans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |