Bulgarian vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Filipino
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Filipinos
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,354,998 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,527,529 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 16.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Filipino |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 26.4% |
| Range | 36.4% | 25.5% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 8.4% |
| Median | 11.4% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Filipinos by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Norwegian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from India (10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |