Brazilian vs Armenian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Armenian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Armenians
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Armenian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,749,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Armenian |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 26.9% |
| Range | 29.9% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.9% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Armenians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |