Bahamian vs South African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bahamian
South African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bahamians
South Africans
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs South African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,361,785 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 11.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | South African |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.3% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 26.7% | 23.5% |
| Median | 22.7% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.2% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |