Slovene vs South African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
South African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
South Africans
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs South African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,900,549 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 0.79%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | South African |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 67.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 61.1% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 22.9% | 23.5% |
| Median | 20.8% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes and South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |