Bangladeshi vs South African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
South African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
South Africans
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs South African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,594,140 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 18.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | South African |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.1% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 24.3% | 23.5% |
| Median | 22.9% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.020%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |