Arapaho vs Yaqui Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Yaqui
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Yaqui
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Yaqui Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,746,597 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,553,636 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yaqui and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 3.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Yaqui |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 22.2% |
Range | 31.9% | 21.0% |
Mean | 11.0% | 7.9% |
Median | 10.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Yaqui by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yaqui are Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |