Apache vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Apache
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Apache
Pima
73.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
69.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,122,783 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Apache and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438 and weighted average of 73.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,542,645 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.539 and weighted average of 69.0%, a difference of 6.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Pima |
Minimum | 25.0% | 26.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 88.1% |
Range | 75.0% | 61.8% |
Mean | 62.9% | 64.1% |
Median | 64.7% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.8% | 57.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.0% | 75.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Ute (73.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Native/Alaskan (73.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Crow (73.3%, a difference of 0.52%), Yup'ik (73.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Puerto Rican (73.1%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (69.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Tohono O'odham (70.4%, a difference of 2.0%), Lumbee (70.6%, a difference of 2.3%), Hopi (71.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and Yuman (71.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 75.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 74.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 74.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 74.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 74.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 73.9% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 73.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 73.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 73.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 73.2% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 73.1% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 72.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 72.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 72.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 71.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 71.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 70.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 70.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 69.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 69.0% |