Asian vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Asian
South African
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Asians
South Africans
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,086,140 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,546,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | South African |
| Minimum | 75.5% | 73.6% |
| Maximum | 96.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 21.0% | 26.4% |
| Mean | 85.0% | 86.0% |
| Median | 85.2% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 84.0% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.2% | 90.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and South Africans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Armenian (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chinese (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 94.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Asians | 93.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |