Pima vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
South African
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
South Africans
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,546,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | South African |
| Minimum | 46.4% | 73.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.6% | 26.4% |
| Mean | 79.8% | 86.0% |
| Median | 81.6% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 90.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 78.5 /100 | #144 | Good 84.9% |