Chinese vs Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Chinese
Egyptian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Chinese
Egyptians
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,796,346 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Egyptian |
Minimum | 64.1% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.9% | 80.0% |
Mean | 87.3% | 85.5% |
Median | 86.4% | 85.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.3% | 84.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.6% | 91.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Israel (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Slavic (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants | Romania | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Yugoslavians | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Egyptians | 94.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 94.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 94.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Asians | 93.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |